 |
 |
 |
Response to "7 Biology Myths an Electrical Engineer, Would Never Tolerate" |
||
 |
 |
 |
martes, agosto 3, 2010, 03:43 AM Following is an article written by Perry Marshall to which I add my commentaries in parenthesis:7 Biology Myths an Electrical Engineer, Would Never Tolerate As an Electrical Engineer, I am utterly appalled at the intellectual slop that passes for science in biology. Engineers would lose their jobs in droves if they tolerated the mushy thinking and lack of rigor that is routine in the life sciences. Leer más... [ añadir comentario ] ( 1 visualización ) | enlace permanente |   ( 3.4 / 7 ) |
||
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Respuesta a "7 Biology Myths an Electrical Engineer, Would Never Tolerate" (7 mitos de biología que el ingeniero electricista, Perry Marshall, jamás toleraría). |
||
|
|
|
lunes, agosto 2, 2010, 01:23 AM A continuación doy a conocer mi traducción de un artículo encontrado en la Internet bajo el titulo de "7 Biology Myths an Electrical Engineer, Would Never Tolerate", escrito por Perry Marshall. Mis comentarios al respecto se encuentran entre paréntesis.7 mitos de biología que el ingeniero electricista, Perry Marshall, jamás toleraría. Como ingeniero electricista, estoy totalmente horrorizado por la bazofia intelectual que pasa por ciencia en la biología. Los ingenieros perderían sus empleos en masa si se tolerara el pensamiento deplorable y la falta de rigor que son la rutina en las ciencias de la vida. Leer más... [ añadir comentario ] ( 1 visualización ) | enlace permanente | ( 3.2 / 10 ) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Response to "Evidence for turtle evolution" |
||
|
|
|
martes, mayo 18, 2010, 11:13 PM The following is a transcription of an article first published in the Journal of Creation 21(3):24–26 in December 2007 with the title of "Evidence for turtle evolution" by Jerry Bergman and Wayne Frair. At the end you will find my response to it.The fossil record is rich with many well-preserved turtle shells and a wide variety of turtles ‘dating back’ to before the dinosaurs in the Triassic. Phylogenetic analysis of turtles has resulted in much controversy and conflicting results that vary depending on the techniques used. Molecular evidence also contradicts previous evolutionary classifications based on gross morphological comparisons. The extant evidence shows that turtles appear in the fossil record fully form. Leer más... [ 2 comentarios ] ( 32 visualizaciones ) | enlace permanente | ( 3.2 / 52 ) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Respuesta a "Evidence for Turtle Evolution" (La evidencia de la evolución de la tortuga) |
||
|
|
|
sábado, abril 10, 2010, 03:10 AM A continuación doy a conocer mi traducción de un artículo originalmente publicado en el Journal of Creation 21(3)24-26 de diciembre del 2007 con el nombre de "Evidence for Turtle Evolution" (La evidencia de la evolución de la tortuga) por Jerry Bergman y Wayne Frair. Al final del artículo encontrarán mi respuesta al mismo.Respuesta a "Evidence for Turtle Evolution" (La evidencia de la evolución de la tortuga) El registro fósil es rico en muchas conchas de tortuga bien conservadas y en una amplia variedad de tortugas "que se remontan" a antes de los dinosaurios en el Triásico. El análisis filogenético de las tortugas ha dado lugar a mucha controversia y los resultados contradictorios que varían en función de las técnicas utilizadas. La evidencia molecular también contradice anteriores clasificaciones evolutivas basadas en comparaciones morfológicas. La evidencia existente indica que las tortugas aparecen en el registro fósil completamente formadas. Leer más... [ 1 comentario ] ( 1043 visualizaciones ) | enlace permanente | ( 3.2 / 75 ) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Angry Evolutionist |
||
|
|
|
lunes, noviembre 9, 2009, 05:26 AM Transcription of an article titled “The Angry Evolutionist”, written by Richard Dawkins, published in Internet on Sep 25, 2009 From the Newsweek magazine issue dated Oct 5, 2009.. You will find my commentaries to it in the following 3 articles.The Angry Evolutionist More Americans believe in angels than in evolution—and Richard Dawkins isn't going to take it anymore. Creationists are deeply enamored of the fossil record, because they have been taught (by each other) to repeat, over and over, the mantra that it is full of "gaps": "Show me your 'intermediates!' " They fondly (very fondly) imagine that these "gaps" are an embarrassment to evolutionists. Actually, we are lucky to have any fossils at all, let alone the massive numbers that we now do have to document evolutionary history—large numbers of which, by any standards, constitute beautiful "intermediates." We don't need fossils in order to demonstrate that evolution is a fact. The evidence for evolution would be entirely secure even if not a single corpse had ever fossilized. It is a bonus that we do actually have rich seams of fossils to mine, and more are discovered every day. The fossil evidence for evolution in many major animal groups is wonderfully strong. Nevertheless there are, of course, gaps, and creationists love them obsessively. Leer más... [ 2 comentarios ] ( 746 visualizaciones ) | enlace permanente |  ( 2.9 / 183 ) |
||
|
|
|
Siguiente
